Re: Converting {{a,b},{c,d}} to just {a,b},{c,d} (no enclosing parens) ?

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg28787] Re: Converting {{a,b},{c,d}} to just {a,b},{c,d} (no enclosing parens) ?
• From: "poupoulinou" <emilienne.alcover at wanadoo.fr>
• Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 20:18:20 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <9di042\$kuc@smc.vnet.net>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

```I suggest you to use Sequence (and to read The Book...)
Example :
listOfPoints={{1,2},{3,4}};
Line[{0,1},Sequence@@listOfPoints,{5,5}]
will give :
Line[{0,1},{1,2},{3,4},{5,5}]

"aes" <siegman at stanford.edu> a écrit dans le message news:
9di042\$kuc at smc.vnet.net...
> How can I convert a list of pairs, like
>
>     {{a,b},{c,d},{e,f},. . . }}
>
> into just a sequence of pairs, i.e.
>
>    {a,b}, {c,d}, {e,f}, . . .
>
> with no outer { }'s?
>
> Reason for doing this?  Want to define a Line in the form
>
>    Line[{pt1, pt2, pt3, pt4, pt5, pt6, . . . . . . }]
>
> where some of the points, say pt1 through pt4 are individually defined;
> but then a sequence, say pt5 through pt20, are defined by a Table; then
> pt21, etc are back to individual definitions.
>
> I know -- I could break these into a sequence of Lines -- but it would
> be cleaner if there were a simple way to have one Line[ ]  command with
> all the points inside it.
>

```

• Prev by Date: Re: Decimal math bug?
• Next by Date: Re: Inverse Laplace output format?
• Previous by thread: Re: Converting {{a,b},{c,d}} to just {a,b},{c,d} (no enclosing parens) ?
• Next by thread: RE: Converting {{a,b},{c,d}} to just {a,b},{c,d} (no enclosing parens) ?