Re: Raster and ColorFunctionScaling
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg31574] Re: Raster and ColorFunctionScaling
- From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 03:41:50 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: Universitaet Leipzig
- References: <email@example.com>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
it is not, because the third argument of Raster
gives an explicit range for the color values in the
first argument. There are a lot of bitmap operations
that require an explicit rescaling and the "automatical"
height rescaling would be very confusing for bitmaps.
David Park wrote:
> Dear MathGroup,
> Is there any explanation for the strange behavior of the
> ColorFunctionScaling option when used with the Raster graphics primitive.
> When set to True it simply clamps z < 0 to 0 and z > 1 to 1. But in
> ContourPlot and DensityPlot the minimum and maximum z values in the plot are
> found and then scaled to 0 and 1. It is certainly easy enough for
> Mathematica to find the minimum and maximum values in the raster array, so
> why doesn't Mathematica do the same kind of scaling with Raster? It is
> inconsistent and confusing usage.
> David Park
> djmp at earthlink.net
Prev by Date:
Re: Limit question
Next by Date:
Improving RootSearch Package
Previous by thread:
Raster and ColorFunctionScaling
Next by thread:
A Question about Expression Simplication