Re: notebook2e.sty has conflicts with amsmath.sty...
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg31726] Re: notebook2e.sty has conflicts with amsmath.sty...
- From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:13:48 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: Universitaet Leipzig
- References: <9tlbgi$pgb$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Hi,
\Vec is defined in wrisym.sty and it is for the traditional vector
\
arrow ->, Mathematica use typical an harpoon --- as vector arrow
but if you like.
The simples solution would be to make a personal modification of
wrisym.sty or to load wrisym.sty behind the amsmath package.
Regards
Jens
Nicola wrote:
>
> I already posted this message in a specific Tex/Latex-related group,
> but probably someone in this group has a solution too. Sorry for
> cross-posting...
>
> Is there anyone using these two packages in the same .tex document?
>
> There seems to be a sort of incompatibility between the two, meaning
> that when
> I use both of them I get a "command \Vec already defined" error.
> I browsed through the related .sty files (amsmath.sty and
> notebook2e.sty), and commented lines that seemed to be the appropriate
> ones. But I still get that awful error message.
>
> Is there anyone who can help me out with that issue?
>
> I use package notebook2e to include Mathematica notebooks saved with
> the "Save as Tex" option (in order to show Mathematica code within an
> appendix).
>
> I DO need amsmath package, but any other package that will let me
> include Mathematica code into a .tex document will work fine as well.
>
> Many thanks to anyone willing to give some hints... :-)
>
> Nicola