Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
MathGroup Archive
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2001

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: FullGraphics with Graphics3D

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg31287] Re: FullGraphics with Graphics3D
  • From: manen at (Martijn van Manen)
  • Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 04:28:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • Organization: Universiteit Utrecht, Department of Mathematics
  • References: <9r3cd3$ql9$> <9r578s$s1k$>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

 Jens & everybody else out there,

Though I would be perfectly happy if it did, what you suggest does
not seem to work. If you Show the Graphics obtained from a
Graphics3D object the Axes disappear.  Thus when you then apply
the FullGraphics your Axes are naturally also gone. I came to the 
conclusion after trying a snippet such as:

gr = ParametricPlot3D[{s, (1 - t^2), t + s^3}, {s, -1, 1}, {t, -1, 1}, 
    Axes -> True, AxesLabel -> {"X", "Y", "Z"}];

(* axes are gone *)
(* no axes as well  *)

Maybe you have some other trick that could help me? ( for those 
who were wondering, I'm trying to write a very primitive conversion of
Mathematica graphics to MetaPost )

Thanks in advance,


Jens-Peer Kuska writes:



>  Jens

>Martijn van Manen wrote:
>> Hi,
>> with the FullGraphics command I can get graphics
>> primitives for amongst others the Axes options
>> I specified. But this only seems to work for
>> Graphics objects, that is 2D graphics. How do i
>> get it to work for Graphics3D objects?
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Martijn
>> PS. I am running mathematica 4.1 on solaris.

  • Prev by Date: Re: Using a Mathematica's function in a C program
  • Next by Date: Simplify with If and UnitStep
  • Previous by thread: Re: FullGraphics with Graphics3D
  • Next by thread: Re: FullGraphics with Graphics3D