Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2002
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2002

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

What features do you think ae missing?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg33797] What features do you think ae missing?
  • From: cgeyer at blue.seas.upenn.edu (Christopher M Geyer)
  • Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 03:51:28 -0400 (EDT)
  • Organization: University of Pennsylvania
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

I was wondering what people thought was missing
in Mathematica.  

I can think of two things (at the moment) that I'd like 
to see in the next version of Mathematica:

1. automatic support (i.e. not having to buy Dynamic
Visualizer and not having to do it by hand) for 
antialiasing and transparency in graphics.

2. an operator for Join[] like ML.  E.g. why is there
<> for StringJoin but no equivalent for Join?  Yeah..
I could make my own, but .... and if Mathematica is
optimized for nested lists shouldn't that be transparent
to the user?  

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher Geyer | cgeyer at seas.upenn.edu | http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~cgeyer/


  • Prev by Date: Evaluation of Conditional Definitions
  • Next by Date: Plot with disks
  • Previous by thread: FW: Evaluation of Conditional Definitions
  • Next by thread: Plot with disks