MathGroup Archive 2002

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: 1^Infinity

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg38201] Re: 1^Infinity
  • From: huhoic at aol.com (RAyRAy)
  • Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 03:30:10 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <askfsv$l1n$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

I don't know the answer, but my simple mind is telling me the integer 1 is the
same as 1.0 is that right or no?

what we can also do to look at another perspective is this:

Limit            1^n
n-> Infinity  

anyone?


RAyRAy  =) hehehe

 >Subject: [mg38201] 1^Infinity
>From: "Ersek, Ted R" ErsekTR at navair.navy.mil 
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
>Date: 12/4/2002 12:54 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <askfsv$l1n$1 at smc.vnet.net>
>
> Hello,
> Consider this:
> 
>    In[1]:=
>      1^Infinity
> 
>    Out[1]=
>      Indeterminate
> 
> ---------
> I agree 1.0^Infinity  is Indeterminate because 1.0 might be a bit less
> than 1 or a bit greater than 1.
> but isn't  (1*1*1* ..... *1)  simply the integer 1.
> 
>---------
> Thanks, 
> 
>    Ted Ersek
> 
>




  • Prev by Date: Re: Inverse NxM matrices
  • Next by Date: Re: What is -- Fractional integro-differentiation
  • Previous by thread: 1^Infinity
  • Next by thread: Re: 1^Infinity