MathGroup Archive 2002

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Inverse NxM matrices

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg38218] Re: Inverse NxM matrices
  • From: "David R. Hardoon" <davidh at nospam.cs.rhul.ac.uk>
  • Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 03:32:20 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <askffk$l0e$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

I would like to just add the Kx and Rx are one variable 
respectivly.. and not two (i.e. K and x...)

In <askffk$l0e$1 at smc.vnet.net> David R. Hardoon wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Now I know from what all I have been reading that it is
> impossible (just about) to inverse a NxM matrix. but ..
> I need to simplify this equation but Rx is a NxM matrix
> and Ky is singular (but can be decomposed to RyRy' if needed)
> 
> RxRx'Ky \beta - \delta RxRx'RxR' \alpha = 0
> 
> is there anyway expressing \beta or \alpha?
> 
> please help if possible.
> David,
> 
> p.s.
> to reply back remove the nospam from my email address
> 
> 


  • Prev by Date: Re: odbc vs jdbc for database access in Mathematica
  • Next by Date: Re: 1^Infinity
  • Previous by thread: Inverse NxM matrices
  • Next by thread: x - real variable?