Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
MathGroup Archive
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2002

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: About programming Mathematica [Newbie question]

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg32672] Re: About programming Mathematica [Newbie question]
  • From: <emueller at>
  • Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 03:41:23 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: Ohio State University
  • References: <a3g0rb$co7$>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

You can run mathematica without the front end.  On a unix system (which I
assume your using) just type

math <<input.m >>output.out

and the output will appear in output.out.

Mathematica's front end is however very good.  One of the strengths of
Mathematica is being able to interact with it. 


On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Wyvern wrote:

> Hi. I'm new to Mathematica and I'm having some trouble understanding what
> metaphor it uses for programming. I've used Octave a bit (I did a simple
> simulation of a pursuit problem) and, in Octave, I simply made a file in
> emacs (with a .m ext) and typed the filename in the Octave command line. Not
> exactly sophisticated, but it was easy. What would the comparable
> Mathematica technique? Surely it cannot be to do a function[] := (and then
> some operations) in a notebook. That would mean that I'd have to do cut and
> paste into a new cell to make any changes, which would certainly be a hassle
> compared  to switching windows and doing c-x c-s, then re-executing inside
> Octave. Surely there is a more elegant solution, something more
> self-contained?
> One might ask, if Octave is so darn wonderful, why not do it there? Well,
> it's not very user-friendly, and the whole point of this exercise that I
> need to program is to get familiar with a tool like Mathematica. (I need to
> solve a Hungarian method 10x10 matrix problem.)
> If you can point me the right way as regards to programming, I'm pretty sure
> I can throw together an algorithm, but if you could direct me to an
> algorithm for determining the optimal system for finding zero-covering
> lines, I would be very grateful.
> Please forgive the obviousness of the solution to my problem... I only got
> this software recently.
> Wyvern

  • Prev by Date: Re: Simple integral problem
  • Next by Date: Add a line to the top of a comma delimited file?
  • Previous by thread: Re: About programming Mathematica [Newbie question]
  • Next by thread: Re: ParametricPlot3D