Re: About programming Mathematica [Newbie question]
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg32691] Re: About programming Mathematica [Newbie question]
- From: "Albert REINER" <Use-Author-Address-Header at [127.1]>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 03:41:54 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
- References: <a3g0rb$co7$1@smc.vnet.net> <20020204181645.B2656@frithjof>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Oh, and I forgot: > ... > > emacs (with a .m ext) and typed the filename in the Octave command line. Not > > exactly sophisticated, but it was easy. What would the comparable > > Mathematica technique? Surely it cannot be to do a function[] := (and then > ... > > Well, at least on an OS like Unix you also have the CLI Mathematica, > usually something like /usr/local/bin/math. So: write your definitions > in a file, save that, and pipe it through math. Unfortunately, the > formatting of the output is not truely luxurious. If you know a little bit of emacs lisp, you should be able to set up the correct regexps so that you can use Fred Gylys-Colwell's notebook.el - I suppose google will find it. If you do these modifications, please share! Albert. <a.reiner at gmx.at>