[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: ReadList speed

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg35388] Re: [mg35345] ReadList speed
• From: Tomas Garza <tgarza01 at prodigy.net.mx>
• Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 02:20:38 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <200207091047.GAA25559@smc.vnet.net>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

In general, ReadList is reasonably fast. It depends, of course, on how and
where your data are stored. Some information about that would be useful.
Incidentally, are you writing a semicolon (;) at the end of the ReadList
statement? Otherwise, most of the time goes into displaying the list, which
usually is not necessary.

Tomas Garza
Mexico City
----- Original Message -----
From: "Graham" <lamontgra at yahoo.com>
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Subject: [mg35388] [mg35345] ReadList speed


> Is there a faster way than  ReadList ?
>
> I am reading a 2*60*80 array of reals it takes 205s.
> It almost seems faster just to generate the data again...that can't be
right.
>
> Regards
> Graham Lamont
>

• References:
  • ReadList speed
    • From: lamontgra@yahoo.com (Graham)