Re: ReadList speed
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg35388] Re: [mg35345] ReadList speed
- From: Tomas Garza <tgarza01 at prodigy.net.mx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 02:20:38 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200207091047.GAA25559@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
In general, ReadList is reasonably fast. It depends, of course, on how and where your data are stored. Some information about that would be useful. Incidentally, are you writing a semicolon (;) at the end of the ReadList statement? Otherwise, most of the time goes into displaying the list, which usually is not necessary. Tomas Garza Mexico City ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham" <lamontgra at yahoo.com> To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net Subject: [mg35388] [mg35345] ReadList speed > Is there a faster way than ReadList ? > > I am reading a 2*60*80 array of reals it takes 205s. > It almost seems faster just to generate the data again...that can't be right. > > Regards > Graham Lamont >
- References:
- ReadList speed
- From: lamontgra@yahoo.com (Graham)
- ReadList speed