MathGroup Archive 2002

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

puzzling difference in speed

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg34688] puzzling difference in speed
  • From: "Johannes Ludsteck" <johannes.ludsteck at>
  • Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 04:28:49 -0400 (EDT)
  • Organization: Universitaet Regensburg
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

Dear MathGroup members,
is there anyone out who can explain why
computation of t2 (see below) is about 10 times faster than
computation of t3? (Note that t2 == t3).
The difference cannot be explained by the computation
time of Dimensions[t1], as Out[5] and Out[6] show.

Of course, the answer is not important for my work,
but the puzzling difference in computation time reduces
my confidence that Mathematica manages efficiency
problems of computation in a smart and *transparent* manner.

In[1]:= 	n=50;
In[2]:=		t1=Table[0.0,{n},{n},{n}];

In[3]:=		Timing[t2=Array[Plus,{n,n,n}];]
Out[3]=		{0.05 Second,Null}

In[4]:=		Timing[t3=Array[Plus,Dimensions[t1]];]
Out[4]=		{0.55 Second,Null}

In[5]:=		Timing[dim=Dimensions[t1]]
Out[5]=		{0. Second,{50,50,50}}

In[8]:=		Timing[t4=Array[Plus,dim];]
Out[8]=		{0.49 Second,Null}

By the way: if one tries to  compile the stuff, things
become even more strange:

In[7]:= comp1=Compile[{{t,_Real,3}},
Compile::cpiter: Iterator at position 2 of Array[Plus,Dimensions[t]] 
cannot be compiled; evaluation will use the uncompiled function.

Why does Mathematica refute to compile the code?
Dimensions[t] must be a list of three integers,
since t is a rank 3 tensor. So try to help Mathematica:

In[8]:= comp2=Compile[{{t,_Real,3}},
Compile::cpiter: Iterator at position 2 of Array[Plus,dim] cannot be \
compiled; evaluation will use the uncompiled function.

Again Mathematica does not understand. So try to be more
patient and considerate with the compiler:

In[9]:= comp3=Compile[{{t,_Real,3}},
Out[9] CompiledFunction[...]

At last now Mathematica does the job.

If you type Timing[compi[t1];]
for i in {1,2,3}, you will see that Mathematica is really
confused with comp1 and comp2, since it even reports external
evaluation errors.

Is there any straightforward explanation of such behaviour?

Best regards,
	Johannes Ludsteck

Johannes Ludsteck
Economics Department
University of Regensburg
Universitaetsstrasse 31
93053 Regensburg
Phone +49/0941/943-2741

  • Prev by Date: Re: Efficiency question
  • Next by Date: RE: new user question about creating a new cell
  • Previous by thread: Re: Efficiency question
  • Next by thread: RE: puzzling difference in speed