[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

RE: Functionality and Reliability

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg34971] RE: [mg34958] Functionality and Reliability
• From: "DrBob" <majort at cox-internet.com>
• Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 00:24:07 -0400 (EDT)
• Reply-to: <drbob at bigfoot.com>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

You said it yourself, Maxim.  Not all these problems have solutions.

Personally, although I'm very unhappy when I find things are not well
documented, I have to say I'm amazed at how far WRI has gotten.  I trust
that they will get even closer to the ideal you seek, if they remain
profitable.

Bobby

-----Original Message-----
From: Name [mailto:mee at home.com.redline.ru] 
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Subject: [mg34971] [mg34958] Functionality and Reliability

Some of the problems
considered above do not have a universal solution at all. Does it mean
that computer algebra systems (or let's call them symbolic mathematics
systems) are unreliable in general?

[Please do not quote the whole message if you wish to reply]

Maxim Rytin
m.r at prontomail.com