MathGroup Archive 2002

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Step by step integration

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg37564] Re: Step by step integration
  • From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
  • Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 05:00:08 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: Universitaet Leipzig
  • References: <aq035b$4n8$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Reply-to: kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hi,

AFAIK Mathematica use a Risch algorithm to in Integrate[]
and you can look at:


Geddes, K. O.; Czapor, S. R.; and Labahn, G. "The Risch Integration
Algorithm." 
Ch. 12 in Algorithms for Computer Algebra.
Amsterdam, Netherlands: Kluwer, pp. 511-573, 1992. 

Risch, R. "On the Integration of Elementary Functions 
         which are Built Up using Algebraic Operations." Report
SP-2801/002/00.
        Santa Monica, CA: Sys. Dev. Corp., 1968. 

Risch, R. "The Problem of Integral in Finite Terms." 
  Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 139, 167-189, 1969. 

Risch, R. "The Solution of the Problem of 
  Integration in Finite Terms." Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 1-76, 605-608,
1970. 

Risch, R. "Algebraic Properties of Elementary Functions of Analysis."
Amer. J. Math. 101, 743-759, 1979. 


to see, that a "step by step" integration will help you nothing.

A human is usual better than a stupid machine.

Regards
  Jens

CeZaR wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I saw in Help (Mathematica 4.0) the Step-By-Step Differentiation
> topic.
> I would like to know if it is possible to implement a Step-By-Step
> Integration function in Mathematica.
> There is a site calc101.com which uses webMathematica and has
> implemented such a function.
> 
> If it's not possible, are there any tools available which can?
> 
> I'm trying to learn integration of functions, and Integrate[...] is
> not very usefull.
> 
> Thank you,
> CeZaR


  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: Seemingly simple gridbox question
  • Next by Date: Re: making a block diagonal matrix
  • Previous by thread: Step by step integration
  • Next by thread: rule scoping: bug or feature?