MathGroup Archive 2002

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

RE: Re: Solve simultaneous eqns

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg36927] RE: [mg36905] Re: Solve simultaneous eqns
  • From: "DrBob" <drbob at bigfoot.com>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 03:32:18 -0400 (EDT)
  • Reply-to: <drbob at bigfoot.com>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

>>I should add that the solution is over natural numbers.. this will
probably make a big difference..

Yes, that probably removes the "nearly" from "nearly impossible".

I'd be curious to see the actual problem.

Bobby

-----Original Message-----
From: Nachiketa J Gupta [mailto:ngupta2 at red.seas.upenn.edu] 
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Subject: [mg36927] [mg36905] Re: Solve simultaneous eqns

I should add that the solution is over natural numbers.. this will
probably make a big difference..

Thanks again,

Nachi

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Nachi Gupta wrote:

> I am trying to solve a system of simultaneous equations with 26
variables
> and 14 equations (the 12 free variables can be any of the 26 from the
eqns..
> preferably ones that will minimize the computation time for the other
14).
> These equation are not linearly related.. the highest degree in any
one eqn
> is degree 4 i believe.. and there are some cross terms in the
equations but
> not every equation depends on every variable.. (some are actually
rather
> simple eqns).  Any ideas on how to get started with this using
> mathematica (any ideas for algorithms)..
>
> Anything will be helpful..
>
> I can be reached at ngupta2 at seas.upenn.edu
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Nachi
>
>
>
>






  • Prev by Date: Mathematica stole my X so I had to kill it
  • Next by Date: Re: Are configuration & UI better in 4.2?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Solve simultaneous eqns
  • Next by thread: Re: Need to evaluate functions of the form y=5e+5 x1+2e-1x2, etc., were e means 10^