Re: re: Accuracy and Precision
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg37146] Re: [mg37130] re: Accuracy and Precision
- From: "Mark Coleman" <mark at markscoleman.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 05:56:30 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200210110758.DAA01962@smc.vnet.net> <200210120904.FAA11982@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: "Mark Coleman" <mark at markscoleman.com>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Greetings, I have read with great interest this lively debate on numerical prcesion and accuracy. As I work in the fields of finance and economics, where we feel ourselves blessed if we get three digits of accuracy, I'm curious as to what scientific endeavors require 50+ digits of precision? As I recall there are some areas, such as high energy physics and some elements of astronomy, that might require so many digits in some circumstances. Are there others? Thanks -Mark <snip>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: re: Accuracy and Precision
- From: Daniel Lichtblau <danl@wolfram.com>
- Re: Re: re: Accuracy and Precision
- References:
- re: Accuracy and Precision
- From: Daniel Lichtblau <danl@wolfram.com>
- re: Accuracy and Precision