Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2002
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2002

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: re: Accuracy and Precision

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg37146] Re: [mg37130] re: Accuracy and Precision
  • From: "Mark Coleman" <mark at markscoleman.com>
  • Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 05:56:30 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200210110758.DAA01962@smc.vnet.net> <200210120904.FAA11982@smc.vnet.net>
  • Reply-to: "Mark Coleman" <mark at markscoleman.com>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Greetings,

I have read with great interest this lively debate on numerical prcesion and
accuracy. As I work in the fields of finance and economics, where we feel
ourselves blessed if we get three digits of accuracy, I'm curious as to what
scientific endeavors require 50+ digits of precision? As I recall there are
some areas, such as high energy physics and some elements of astronomy, that
might require so many digits in some circumstances. Are there others?

Thanks

-Mark


<snip>




  • Prev by Date: Re: ParametricPlot Question
  • Next by Date: Re: Complex numbers
  • Previous by thread: re: Accuracy and Precision
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: re: Accuracy and Precision