[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: re: Accuracy and Precision

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg37146] Re: [mg37130] re: Accuracy and Precision
• From: "Mark Coleman" <mark at markscoleman.com>
• Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 05:56:30 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <200210110758.DAA01962@smc.vnet.net> <200210120904.FAA11982@smc.vnet.net>
• Reply-to: "Mark Coleman" <mark at markscoleman.com>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Greetings,

I have read with great interest this lively debate on numerical prcesion and
accuracy. As I work in the fields of finance and economics, where we feel
ourselves blessed if we get three digits of accuracy, I'm curious as to what
scientific endeavors require 50+ digits of precision? As I recall there are
some areas, such as high energy physics and some elements of astronomy, that
might require so many digits in some circumstances. Are there others?

Thanks

-Mark


<snip>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: re: Accuracy and Precision
    • From: Daniel Lichtblau <danl@wolfram.com>

• References:
  • re: Accuracy and Precision
    • From: Daniel Lichtblau <danl@wolfram.com>