[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Maintaining Multiple Forms of a Function For Different Purposes
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg36745] Maintaining Multiple Forms of a Function For Different Purposes
*From*: "A.M. Sauer-Budge" <ambudge at MIT.EDU>
*Date*: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 04:32:25 -0400 (EDT)
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
I would like to build my Mathematica notebooks in manner which allows me
to carry out two overlapping purposes: 1) prototype an algorithm
completely within Mathematica, 2) use Mathematica as a partial evaluator
to splice derived expressions into a C language version of the algorithm (
with the aid of the Format package from MathSource). The key
complication in doing this is that for the Mathematica prototype I want
everything to be evaluated, while for splicing I want the results from
some of the functions to be retained as data in temporary variables.
A first step towards these purposes is simple: write my component
functions so they operate on lists (the natural form of the prototype
data), then provide lists of arrays for arguments which I would like to
supply as data in the resulting C language output forms.
An example:
--------------------------------------------------
In[1]:= t[x_] := {x[[4]]-x[[3]], x[[2]]-x[[1]]}
In[2]:= f[x_,y_] := {y, 1}.t[x]
In[3]:= f[{1,2,3,4},2]
Out[3]= 3
In[4]:= f[Array[x,4],2]
Out[4]= -x[1] + x[2] + 2 (-x[3] + x[4])
In[5]:= CAssign[fcnval, f[Array[x,4],2], AssignToArray->{x}]
Out[5]//OutputForm= fcnval=-x[1]+x[2]+2.*(-x[3]+x[4]);
--------------------------------------------------
For various reasons, however, I would like certain expressions of my
symbolic derivation to be treated as data for the C language version.
In the above example, for instance, I would like the array that function
t produces to be a data array.
The modification of the above example:
--------------------------------------------------
In[6]:= tc[x_] := Array[tt,2]
In[7]:= fc[x_,y_] := {y, 1}.tc[x]
In[8]:= CAssign[tt, t[Array[x,4]], AssignToArray->{x}]
Out[8]//OutputForm= tt[0]=-x[3]+x[4];
tt[1]=-x[1]+x[2];
In[9]:= CAssign[fcnval, fc[Array[x,4],2], AssignToArray->{tt}]
Out[9]//OutputForm= fcnval=2.*tt[1]+tt[2];
--------------------------------------------------
But I don't want to carry around two versions of everything, nor do I
really want to thread all of the supporting functions through my
definitions in order to choose the correct function for the purpose I
would rather define the C language alternatives only for functions like
t and tc in the example, with f using the appropriate one depending on
some evaluation flag that I set at the highest level.
For example, it would be nice to be able to sprinkle in the C language
alternatives with a construct like
In[10]:= t[x_] := {x[[4]]-x[[3]], x[[2]]-x[[1]]}
In[11]:= DefineTemporaryForm[t[x_]] := Array[tt,Length[x]/2]
then be able to write
In[8]:= CAssign[tt, t[Array[x,4]], AssignToArray->{x}]
Out[8]//OutputForm= tt[0]=-x[3]+x[4];
tt[1]=-x[1]+x[2];
In[9]:= CAssign[fcnval, UseTemporaryForm[f[Array[x,4],2]], AssignToArray-
>{tt}]
Out[9]//OutputForm= fcnval=2.*tt[1]+tt[2];
I would appreciate any pointers on a good, clean and hopefully simple
way to do this within Mathematica!
Thanks,
Alex
Prev by Date:
**Defining Multiple Forms of a Function for Different Purposes**
Next by Date:
**RE: Re: Ball Rolling down on Cosh[t] Path**
Previous by thread:
**Defining Multiple Forms of a Function for Different Purposes**
Next by thread:
**how to plot with BOLD LINE with mathematica?**
| |