MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Suggestion: Visualization of complex functions with Mathematica

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg44862] Re: Suggestion: Visualization of complex functions with Mathematica
  • From: "Steve Luttrell" <luttrell at _removemefirst_westmal.demon.co.uk>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 03:04:19 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <bqkb3v$hkt$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Have a look at the Graphics`ComplexMap` package. It is documented in the
Add-ons/StandardPackages/Graphics/ComplexMap entry in the Help browser.

--
Steve Luttrell
West Malvern, UK

""René Böhlendorf"" <R.Boehlendorf at t-online.de> wrote in message
news:bqkb3v$hkt$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> Dear Madams and Sirs,
>
> I am an owner of Mathematica 4.2.0.0 and got
> my diploma in mathematics from Technische Universit=E4t Berlin in the
> year 1981. My thesis was about complex analysis with the title 'Der
> universelle Teichm=FCllerraum', which is a space of conformal mappings
> from a part of the complex sphere with quasiconformal continuations to
> the complete complex sphere.
>
> I was always interested to visualize complex functions, but the possi-
> bilities are rather limited as we can visually imagine only threedimen-
> sional objects and the graph of a complex function of one variable
> would be a fourdimensional object.
>
> I was wondering if your program Mathematica would try to offer some-
> thing to visualize complex functions in terms of four dimensions, but
> I did not find something which is quite understandable.
>
> Nevertheless I want to offer two ideas to you which you could evaluate
> and possibly implement in future versions of Mathematica. I understand
> that Mathematica aims mainly at teaching mathematics besides being a
> general help for technicians, physicists, mathematicians and all other
> persons applying mathematics.
>
> Visualizations of complex functions are up to now only graphs of the
> absolute value, the real or the imaginary part of the function. This
> gives only a poor impression similar to seeing only a shadow of an
> object instead of the object itself.
>
> 1. My first idea is to view the complex plane as a normal twodimensio-
>    nal Euclidian plane and attach a twodimensional vector to each point
>    to represent the value of a complex function there.
>
>    Of course there are many problems to view such an object. It would
>    look more or less like a cornfield and it would be difficult to get
>    a good impression of the behaviour of the complex function which is
>    displayed.
>
>    I thought about drawing such a picture with help of Mathematica or
>    other programs for some simple functions and use only a small set of
>    points, but found it too troublesome for me and of no general value.
>
>    A function in Mathematica which would draw such a 'cornfield' auto-
>    matically using a raster would save me this trouble and be a great
>    fun for me! Although it would be not too interesting for professio-
>    nal mathematicians who work in complex analysis it could serve as a
>    good help to teach complex analysis for beginners by showing true
>    graphs of a complex function.
>
> 2. My second idea is to use colour and it is perhaps the better one.
>
>    The complex plane or sphere would be coloured in such a way that
>    different regions have different colours, perhaps even using con-
>    tinuously changing colours.
>
>    The visualization of the complex function would be a second plane
>    or sphere showing the same colours as the first one, but moved to
>    the place they get by applying the complex function. I believe that
>    this will produce good and impressive pictures for many complex
>    functions although I did never see such pictures up to now!
>
> As I worked in the area of software development since 1981 I am able
> to estimate that quite a lot of work would have to be done if you would
> decide to implement one or both of my ideas in Mathematica.
>
> At least I hope that you will think the ideas over even if you should
> decide not to implement them. A few lines as a response to me when it
> is convenient for you would make me happy!
>
> Faithfully yours,
> Ren=E9 B=F6hlendorf
>



  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: How to NOT convert Sin[x]/Cos[x] to Tan[x] ?
  • Next by Date: Re: Disabling Groups of Cells
  • Previous by thread: Re: Suggestion: Visualization of complex functions with Mathematica
  • Next by thread: Re: Suggestion: Visualization of complex functions with Mathematica