Re: Re: Porting graphics to MicroSoft Point, with quality - no
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg39524] Re: [mg39492] Re: Porting graphics to MicroSoft Point, with quality - no
- From: Gerry Flanagan <flanagan at materials-sciences.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 04:08:06 -0500 (EST)
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Try using the Export command, and explicitly setting the
resolution. This creates a file that you bring into PowerPoint. I
frequently export as an eps file, then use an eps viewer (Ghostview) to
create a bitmap with the resolution I need for a particular presentation.
Copy as metafile (for windows) is sometimes successful and
full-resolution, but there are sometimes glitches with fonts and other
At 04:42 AM 2/19/2003 -0500, Marc Heusser wrote:
b2ib8s$pvi$1 at smc.vnet.net,
liu at vtaix.cc.vt.edu (Xiangdong Liu) wrote:
I plot 2D and 3D graphics that have many details.
But if I copy and paste the Mathematica graphics to PowerPoint, the
graphics look not even as good as in Mathematica. And when I print the
PowerPoint document on the same 600 dpi printer, the graphics look just
as bad as in PowerPoint. I tried Paste and all options under Paste
Special None achieves as good quality as I see with printing directly
from within Mathematica.
I remember having the same problems in earlier versions of PowerPoint.
At that time at least the issue was that PowerPoint had a minimum line
thickness! It had nothing to do with the originating programme.
Hope that helps (if only to know it does not work.
remove the obvious CHEERS and MERCIAL... from the reply address
to reply via e-mail
Prev by Date:
Re: Solving Alphametics with Mathematica
Next by Date:
Re: Finding the closest number from a list
Previous by thread:
Re: Porting graphics to MicroSoft Point, with quality - no
Next by thread:
Java prog opens nb in Mathematica frontend which prompts for input - fails in background