Re: Re: Porting graphics to MicroSoft Point, with quality - no
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg39524] Re: [mg39492] Re: Porting graphics to MicroSoft Point, with quality - no
- From: Gerry Flanagan <flanagan at materials-sciences.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 04:08:06 -0500 (EST)
- References: <b2ib8s$pvi$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Try using the Export command, and explicitly setting the resolution. This creates a file that you bring into PowerPoint. I frequently export as an eps file, then use an eps viewer (Ghostview) to create a bitmap with the resolution I need for a particular presentation. Copy as metafile (for windows) is sometimes successful and full-resolution, but there are sometimes glitches with fonts and other details. Gerry F. At 04:42 AM 2/19/2003 -0500, Marc Heusser wrote: In article b2ib8s$pvi$1 at smc.vnet.net, liu at vtaix.cc.vt.edu (Xiangdong Liu) wrote: I plot 2D and 3D graphics that have many details. But if I copy and paste the Mathematica graphics to PowerPoint, the graphics look not even as good as in Mathematica. And when I print the PowerPoint document on the same 600 dpi printer, the graphics look just as bad as in PowerPoint. I tried Paste and all options under Paste Special None achieves as good quality as I see with printing directly from within Mathematica. I remember having the same problems in earlier versions of PowerPoint. At that time at least the issue was that PowerPoint had a minimum line thickness! It had nothing to do with the originating programme. Hope that helps (if only to know it does not work. Marc Marc Heusser remove the obvious CHEERS and MERCIAL... from the reply address to reply via e-mail