|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Porting graphics to MicroSoft Point, with quality - no
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg39492] Re: Porting graphics to MicroSoft Point, with quality - no
- From: Marc Heusser <marc.heusser at CHEERSheusser.comMERCIALSPAMMERS.invalid>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 04:42:30 -0500 (EST)
- Complaints-to: abuse@bluewin.ch
- References: <b2ib8s$pvi$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
In article <b2ib8s$pvi$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
liu at vtaix.cc.vt.edu (Xiangdong Liu) wrote:
> I plot 2D and 3D graphics that have many details.
>
> But if I copy and paste the Mathematica graphics to PowerPoint, the
> graphics look not even as good as in Mathematica. And when I print the
> PowerPoint document on the same 600 dpi printer, the graphics look just
> as bad as in PowerPoint. I tried "Paste" and all options under "Paste
> Special". None achieves as good quality as I see with printing directly
> from within Mathematica.
I remember having the same problems in earlier versions of PowerPoint.
At that time at least the issue was that PowerPoint had a minimum line
thickness! It had nothing to do with the originating programme.
Hope that helps (if only to know it does not work :-( )
Marc
--
Marc Heusser
remove the obvious CHEERS and MERCIAL... from the reply address
to reply via e-mail
Prev by Date:
ConstrainedMin: "assertion failed at "\[InvisibleSpace]" after perturbation steplength > 0"
Next by Date:
Re: Integer factorization in Mathematica
Previous by thread:
ConstrainedMin: "assertion failed at "\[InvisibleSpace]" after perturbation steplength > 0"
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Porting graphics to MicroSoft Point, with quality - no
|