MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Interpoint distances

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg41372] Re: Interpoint distances
  • From: "DIAMOND Mark R." <dot at dot.dot>
  • Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 06:45:58 -0400 (EDT)
  • Organization: The University of Western Australia
  • References: <b9viqt$dvt$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Andrej,

You are quite right. Union was a cheat ... relying on the fact that the
probability of two random  reals in [0,1] being equal was zero (rather than
impossible), and obviously somewhat more likely with finite precision.

I have a slow machine ... so I'm very grateful for the speedup suggestions
and will compare them over the weekend and post the results.

Cheers,
Mark
--
Mark R. Diamond





  • Prev by Date: Re: Palettes always on top
  • Next by Date: Re: (la)tex export as batch process?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Interpoint distances
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Interpoint distances