Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2003
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

RE: RE: Part 2 of a recent post on Plot ...

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg44466] RE: RE: Part 2 of a recent post on Plot ...
  • From: Mariusz Jankowski<mjankowski at usm.maine.edu>
  • Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:55:50 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: University of Maine System testbed server
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Thanks to all for your comments and opinions. It was a great read, because they are as varied as the spectrum of possibilities ranging from: (a) this is a bug to ... (z) a natural evolution of capabilities. It is very interesting how within the design of a basic and "everyday" function such as Plot lurk truly important and deep design issues. What is or isn't considered a software bug by us seems increasingly to depend on cultural issues. Anyhow, in the end, since some of you are happy and I encountered this feature just once, I can however begrudgingly, accept it.

Regards, Mariusz

PS: It was pointed out to me that I may have inadvertently confused some readers by using the term range to refer to the x-axis values, the domain, of the plotted function.


  • Prev by Date: Re: MathLink Help
  • Next by Date: Re: MathLink for BCC and/or Dev-C++
  • Previous by thread: RE: Re: Unevaluated
  • Next by thread: Question About Weibull Distribution