|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Mesh generation in 2D
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg44694] Re: Mesh generation in 2D
- From: "Jens-Peer Kuska" <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig-de>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 05:13:17 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: Uni Leipzig
- References: <bphu5i$1nn$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Hi,
http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/sowen/softsurv.html
http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/project/quake/public/www/triangle.html
and the commandline tools can be used with Matheaticas Run[] command.
Regards
Jens
"Goyder Dr HGD" <H.Goyder at rmcs.cranfield.ac.uk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:bphu5i$1nn$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> Dear MathGroup,
>
> What is the best way to generate a mesh of triangles for a 2D grid on a
> general nonconvex region?
>
> I know that in version 4.2 there is a computational geometry add-on and
that
> there is a package for polygon triangulation at
> http://library.wolfram.com/packages/polygontriangulation/ by Martin Kraus
> and also there is the book and packages by Tom Wickham-Jones
> http://library.wolfram.com/infocenter/Books/3753/ . However, I cannot find
a
> procedure for putting this altogether to make a triangular mesh.
>
> What I am looking for is:
>
> 1. The ability to put grid nodes in a general nonconvex region so that the
> triangles are all about the same size and the triangles are as close as
> possible to equilateral.
>
> 2. The ability to weight the size of the triangles so that I can put more
> grid where it is needed.
>
> 3. The ability to enforce lines within the region (not necessarily
straight)
> so that I can have barriers with no thickness.
>
> 4. Everything implemented in Mathematica.
>
> Has this all been done or am I asking for the impossible?
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> Hugh Goyder
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by the Cranfield MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
Prev by Date:
Re: 3D Convex Hull : corrected URI
Next by Date:
Re: Readability confuses mathematica?
Previous by thread:
Mesh generation in 2D
Next by thread:
Re: Mesh generation in 2D
|