       Re: piecewise definition of a function

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg43901] Re: [mg43870] piecewise definition of a function
• From: Tomas Garza <tgarza01 at prodigy.net.mx>
• Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 03:06:24 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <200310090555.BAA06768@smc.vnet.net>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

```I guess that in this particular case you'd do better using UnitStep (q.v.).
Plot this to check that this is indeed the function you wish to integrate:

In:=
f[x_] := UnitStep[x*(1 - x)]

In:=
Integrate[f[x], {x, -50, 50}]
Out=
1

Tomas Garza
Mexico City
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan Moore" <nmoore at physics.umn.edu>
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Subject: [mg43901] [mg43870] piecewise definition of a function

> I'd like to define a function in a piecewise manner.  As of yet I've
> been unsuccessful with even the simplest example.  Consider the
> following:
>
> first define a 1-d bump,
>
> f[x_] = If[x < 0, 0,If[x > 1, 0, 1]]
>   Mathematica doesn't seem to mind this, as f[0.1] evaluates 1 and
> f[-23] evaluates 0.
> The problem comes when I try to integrate the function.  The
> following command which should evaluate to 1 doesn't work AT ALL!
>
> Integrate[f[x], {x, -50, 50}]
>
> What is the proper technique here?
>
> Nathan Moore
> University of Minnesota Physics
>
>

```

• Prev by Date: Re: piecewise definition of a function
• Next by Date: RE: Perform an assigment
• Previous by thread: Re: piecewise definition of a function
• Next by thread: Re: piecewise definition of a function