Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2004
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Overflow --> Abort evaluation

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg47272] Re: Overflow --> Abort evaluation
  • From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
  • Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 03:30:15 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: Universitaet Leipzig
  • References: <c4ge8c$ce$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Reply-to: kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hi,

I don't know what the next input line mean, the next
Cell[] or the next line in a CompoundExpression[] ?

But Check[] may help you, like

Check[2^2^2^2^2^2, $Failed, General::ovfl]

Regards
  Jens


Holger wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> here is one tricky thing I wasn't able to figure out yet: Is it
> possible to let a certain input line evaluate and in case this input
> line does cause a message (for example: General::ovfl) jump to the
> next line and not be bothered by the Overflow input line? The
> background is that I do some awkward computations that may cause a
> message like overflow or so and this then wastes a lo of time without
> yielding anything reasonable. Thanks a lot,
> 
>                         Holger


  • Prev by Date: Re: change PlotStyle in Graphics object after the fact?
  • Next by Date: Re: change PlotStyle in Graphics object after the fact?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Overflow --> Abort evaluation
  • Next by thread: Re: Consolidated method for solution of strange character in