RE: Vector-valued functions
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg47348] RE: [mg47321] Vector-valued functions
- From: Jonas at iui.se
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 06:36:32 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Use := in defining the g function:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: me at my.co [mailto:me at my.co]
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
> Sent: den 5 april 2004 11:23
> To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
> Subject: [mg47348] [mg47321] Vector-valued functions
> Hi, Experts !
> I often encounter the following situation:
> I have a function that creates a list (=vector) as output.
> For example:
> I have to use, for example, the second part of the vector
> in a subsequent expression. When I try that as, for example,
> g[i_,j_,k_]=f[i,j,k][] Mathematica gives the error message
> 'Part n does not exist'
> because f[i,j,k] is indeed not yet evaluated.
> What is the best way to I make [[...]] behave like [...] so
> that it stays
> unevaluated unless it can be evaluated ?
> I can think of three ways:
> - Use functional arguments [...] instead of lists [[...]] alltogether.
> - Rename Part[...] into something else so that Mathematica
> does not complain.
> - Make frequent use of Hold[...].
> All three ways are a bit ugly, I feel. Which (other) method
> is preferred ? I could imagine that this is a rather common
> question but I found no discussion about it.
> Thank you !
Prev by Date:
Re: Plotting a surface side-by-side
Next by Date:
problems with FindRoot: what worked with 4.2 does not work with 5.0
Previous by thread:
Re: Vector-valued functions
Next by thread:
Re: Problem with AltGr key on german keyboard