|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
When Is Precision[ ] $MachinePrecision, And When Is It Not?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg47440] When Is Precision[ ] $MachinePrecision, And When Is It Not?
- From: Harold.Noffke at wpafb.af.mil (Harold Noffke)
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:44:54 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
$Version "5.0 for Microsoft Windows [2000] (November 18, 2003)"
MathGroup:
Some follow-up to Peng Yu's 2004-04-09 post on numerical precision.
On my machine, I get ...
In[1]:= $MachinePrecision
Out[1]= 15.9546
In[2]:= NumberForm[2./3.]
Out[2]//NumberForm= 0.666667
In[3]:= NumberForm[2./3., $MachinePrecision]
NumberForm::iprf:
Formatting specification 15.9546
should be a positive integer or a pair of positive integers.
Out[3]//NumberForm= 0.666667
So, it seems obvious I can't display numbers to $MachinePrecision
exactly, because $MachinePrecion is not an integer. However ...
In[2]:= NumberForm[2./3., 15]
Out[2]//NumberForm= 0.666666666666667
In[3]:= NumberForm[2./3., 15] // Precision
Out[3]= MachinePrecision
In[4]:= NumberForm[2./3., 16]
Out[4]//NumberForm= 0.6666666666666666
In[5]:= NumberForm[2./3., 16] // Precision
Out[5]= MachinePrecision
In[6]:= NumberForm[2./3., 20] // Precision
Out[6]= MachinePrecision
At this point, it looks like 15-digit numbers get rounded, as I
expect. However, 16- and larger-digit numbers do not get rounded, and
Mathematica continues to print "MachinePrecision" instead of
"Arbitrary-Precision". What I expect here is for rounding to
continue, and for Mathematica to print "Arbitrary-Precision" instead
of "MachinePrecision" when the number of digits specified become 16 or
greater.
Clearly I am missing one of Mathematica's syntax subtilties. Can
someone please clarify this?
Thanks.
Harold
Prev by Date:
Re: Re: Is there any productive way to use Mathematica + pdfLaTeX?
Next by Date:
Re: Complex Numbers
Previous by thread:
Skewed axes on "Show"-ing
Next by thread:
Re: When Is Precision[ ] $MachinePrecision, And When Is It Not?
|