|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
A simple integral
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg47596] A simple integral
- From: "Dr A.H. Harker" <a.harker at ucl.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 02:31:37 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
A simple integration, under Version 4.1.2:
Integrate[x^2 Exp[-(x-$B&L(B)^2/(2 $B&R(B^2)],{x,-$B!g(B,$B!g(B}]
2
If[Re[$B&R(B ] > 0,
2
Sqrt[2 Pi] Sqrt[$B&R(B ]
2 2
($B&L(B + $B&R(B ),
2
x
Integrate[----------------,
2 2
(x - $B&L(B) /(2 $B&R(B )
E
{x, -Infinity, Infinity}]]
and the same under 5.0
Integrate[x^2 Exp[-(x-$B&L(B)^2/(2 $B&R(B^2)],{x,-$B!g(B,$B!g(B}]
2 $B&L(B
If[Re[$B&R(B ] > 0 && Re[--] < 0,
2
$B&R(B
2 2
Sqrt[2 Pi] $B&L(B ($B&L(B + $B&R(B )
-(----------------------),
2
$B&L(B
Sqrt[--]
2
$B&R(B
2
x
Integrate[----------------,
2 2
(x - $B&L(B) /(2 $B&R(B )
E
{x, -Infinity, Infinity},
Assumptions ->
$B&L(B 2
Re[--] >= 0 || Re[$B&R(B ] <= 0
2
$B&R(B
]]
Two questions:
1. Whence the extra condition in Version 5?
2. Why the negative sign in Version 5? Using PowerExpand then gives
a negative result for this integral which is patently, for real
parameters, positive.
Am I alone in feeling that Version 5 has introduced more problems than
it has solved?
Dr A.H. Harker
Department of Physics and Astronomy
University College London
Gower Street
LONDON
WC1E 6BT
(44)(0)207 679 3404
a.harker at ucl.ac.uk
Prev by Date:
Re: undocumented function: StringQ
Next by Date:
Re: Returning rules ...
Previous by thread:
Re: Incidence/frequency of numbers in lists
Next by thread:
Re: A simple integral
|