Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2004
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Programming style

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg47604] Re: [mg47597] Programming style
  • From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
  • Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 04:15:01 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200404170631.CAA16298@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

I would say it greatly depends what sort of programming you are 
intending to do. If it is to do with any kind of algebra than 
functional programming (prefarably with pattern matching a la 
Mathematica) is, in my opinion,  not just the best way but the only 
way.
For other things, e. g. numerics, it does not seem to matter that  much.

Andrzej Kozlowski


On 17 Apr 2004, at 15:31, lorenzo.keegan at handbag.com wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am an experienced computer programmer having used ADA, C, Visual 
> Basic
> etc. for years.
>
> Recently I bought the book "Mathematica - A Practical Approach", where 
> different
> styles of programming are discussed, namely
> Functional programming versus Procedural programming.
>
> The book seems to suggest that most Scientist and "professional" 
> Mathematica
> users prefer the Functional programming approach.
>
> For years I have been working with the "Procedural" method.
>
> What are your feelings ? Is it worth the effort to learn the Functional
> method ? Does it matter ?
>
> Thanks for your time
>
> Best Wishes
> Laurence Keegan
>
>


  • Prev by Date: Re: Programming style
  • Next by Date: RE: Programming style
  • Previous by thread: Programming style
  • Next by thread: Re: Programming style