|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: The Wave Equation : Mathematica vs. Mathworld
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg47895] Re: [mg47873] The Wave Equation : Mathematica vs. Mathworld
- From: Cheng Liu <cliu at lanl.gov>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 19:39:41 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Because the equation you were trying to solve is not a wave equation!
At 01:05 AM 4/29/2004, Gilmar Rodr?guez Pierluissi wrote:
>*******************************************************************************
>I'm attempting to duplicate the analysis found in:
>
>http://mathworld.wolfram.com/WaveEquation.html
>
>about how to derive a solution to the Wave Equation.
>I want to get to that solution using Mathematica.
>The solution to the Wave Equation is given by Eq(39)
>displayed on the above website.
>To see my attempt to solve the Wave Equation using Mathematica v.5,
>please double-click the following internet link, and save
>this notebook into a directory of your choice:
>
>http://www.tilmarlily.netfirms.com/download/wave.nb
>
>The solution given by Out[2](in the notebook) is very different
>from Eq(39).
>
>My question is, why is the solution given by Mathematica so
>different than the classical result given by Eq(39)in the Mathworld
>website?
>
>Thank you!
===================================
Cheng Liu, Ph.D.
MST-8, MS-G755
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Los Alamos, NM 87545
email: cliu at lanl.gov
Phone: (505)665-6892 (office)
(505)667-9950 (lab)
Fax: (505)667-8021
===================================
Prev by Date:
Re: ListPlot3D with holes
Next by Date:
Re: Print Settings
Previous by thread:
The Wave Equation : Mathematica vs. Mathworld
Next by thread:
Re: The Wave Equation : Mathematica vs. Mathworld
|