MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Hypergeometric function


Hi,

it depend on your input data, i. e.,

In[]:=Hypergeometric2F1[1, 2, 3, 0.5]
Out[]=1.54518
In[]:=Hypergeometric2F1[1, 2, 3, 0.5`30]
Out[]=1.54517744447956247533785697166

In[]:=Hypergeometric2F1[1, 2, 3, 0.5`300]
Out[]=1.5451774444795624753378569716654125446040010748820420329654400759471489757575\
577248469066159713495003360118481645654858694841618860650444562613660130806076\
954458205666269714815224563089911333877689868009229159836419129638013814525994\
5652124419787311620706360362405676261093314123283391326251961634992

Regards
  Jens


Scott wrote:
> 
> I have a finite alternating series of hypergeometric (2F1) functions.
> These functions have complex parameters.  When I sum the series I get
> larger and larger values.  My question is this,  does anyone know how
> precise Mathematica is when calculating a hypergeometric fn
> numerically ie, how many sig figs are correct?
> 
> I have done various transformations on the hypergeometric fn and then
> summed the series.  Each time I arrive at the same result.
> 
> Thanks for any replies,
> Scott


  • Prev by Date: Re: Label of Max[list]
  • Next by Date: Re: Problem rephrased: how to simplify summation of millions of exponentials symbolicly
  • Previous by thread: Hypergeometric function
  • Next by thread: Re: Hypergeometric function