Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
MathGroup Archive
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Hypergeometric function

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg50202] Re: Hypergeometric function
  • From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at>
  • Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 04:57:48 -0400 (EDT)
  • Organization: Universitaet Leipzig
  • References: <cg20ms$p0q$>
  • Reply-to: kuska at
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at


it depend on your input data, i. e.,

In[]:=Hypergeometric2F1[1, 2, 3, 0.5]
In[]:=Hypergeometric2F1[1, 2, 3, 0.5`30]

In[]:=Hypergeometric2F1[1, 2, 3, 0.5`300]


Scott wrote:
> I have a finite alternating series of hypergeometric (2F1) functions.
> These functions have complex parameters.  When I sum the series I get
> larger and larger values.  My question is this,  does anyone know how
> precise Mathematica is when calculating a hypergeometric fn
> numerically ie, how many sig figs are correct?
> I have done various transformations on the hypergeometric fn and then
> summed the series.  Each time I arrive at the same result.
> Thanks for any replies,
> Scott

  • Prev by Date: Re: Label of Max[list]
  • Next by Date: Re: Problem rephrased: how to simplify summation of millions of exponentials symbolicly
  • Previous by thread: Hypergeometric function
  • Next by thread: Re: Hypergeometric function