[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Using LevenbergMarquardt Method with a complicated function
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg52745] Re: Using LevenbergMarquardt Method with a complicated function
*From*: rknapp at wolfram.com
*Date*: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 05:22:15 -0500 (EST)
*References*: <c42fu1475r5h@legacy><cpavsq$j0p$1@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
algaba wrote:
> Hi.
> I have defined a very long function like this:
>
> ChiSquare[Per0_?NumericQ, Ppa0_?NumericQ, Ecc0_?NumericQ] :=
>
> (some steps and definitions here)
>
> ChiSQ = Sum[ResAlpha[[i]]^2 + ResDelta[[i]]^2, {i, 1, Length[
> TExp]}] + Sum[ResAlphaComp[[i]]^2 +
> ResDeltaComp[[i]]^2, {i, 1, Length[TComp]}]);
>
> which tries to find the Chi-Square of an array of data. Now, I want to
> minimize it and I use FindMinimum, which works well. The problem
> arises when I want to use the Levenberg-Marquardt method, which seems
> to be better for this kind of functions (As you can see, it is a sum
> of squares) But when I run Mathematica 5 it gives me the next error
> message:
>
> FindMinimum::notlm: The objective function for the method
> LevenbergMarquardt \
> must be in a least-squares form: Sum[f[i][x]^2,{i,1,n}] or Sum[w[i] \
> f[i][x]^2,{i,1,n}] with positive w[i].
>
> I think the function accomplishes all the requirements. Why I get this
> error? Is it maybe because of the long definition of the function? Is
> it because Mathematica doesn't see this function as a sum of squares
> but as a sequence of steps?
> What can I do to solve this problem? I do want to use this method to
> minimize the Chi-Square. Thanks.
>
Because the definition is set up to only evaluate with numerical values
of the arguments, Mathematica cannot do the computations necessary to
decompose the sum of squares. To use the Levenberg-Marquardt method,
the function needs to be decomposed into a residual function r[X] such
that f[X] = r[X].r[X]/2.
The LevenbergMarquardt method has a method option that allows you to
specify the residual explicitly for cases like this where you may not
want the sum of squares evaluated symbolically. Here is a simple
example that should give you an idea of how it works:
In[1]:=
SS[x_?NumberQ, y_?NumberQ] := (x - 1)^2 + 100 (y - x^2)^2
In[2]:=
FindMinimum[SS[x,y],{{x,1},{y,-1}}, Method->"LevenbergMarquardt"]
>From In[2]:=
FindMinimum::notlm:
The objective function for the method
LevenbergMarquardt must be in a least-squares
form: Sum[f[i][x]^2,{i,1,n}] or Sum[w[i]
f[i][x]^2,{i,1,n}] with positive w[i]. More...
Out[2]=
FindMinimum[SS[x, y], {{x, 1}, {y, -1}},
Method -> LevenbergMarquardt]
In[3]:=
R[x_?NumberQ, y_?NumberQ] := Sqrt[2] {x-1, 10 (y -x^2)}
In[4]:= FindMinimum[SS[x,y], {{x,1},{y,-1}},
Method->{"LevenbergMarquardt", "Residual"->R[x,y]}]
Out[4]=
{0., {x -> 1., y -> 1.}}
Note you could leave out the Sqrt[2] and minimize 2 SS[x,y] which would
be slightly more efficient.
There is more explanation and examples in the Advanced Documentation
for unconstrained optimization. Look in the Mathematica help browser
under
Advanced Documentation->Optimization->Unconstrained
Optimization->Methods for Local Minimization->Gauss Newton Methods
Rob Knapp
Wolfram Research
Prev by Date:
**Re: Re: finite domains**
Next by Date:
**Re: Mathematica 5.1 Integrals**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Using LevenbergMarquardt Method with a complicated function**
Next by thread:
**Re: Using LevenbergMarquardt Method with a complicated function**
| |