[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Mathematica language issues

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg53167] Re: [mg53142] Re: [mg53112] Re: [mg53050] Re: Mathematica language issues
• From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
• Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 06:41:39 -0500 (EST)
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

On 26 Dec 2004, at 12:14, DrBob wrote:

>>> Occasionally WRI admits that this behaviour is not what they 
>>> intended and
>>> it then is officially classified as a bug.
>
> I don't think I've ever heard of a case like that. At most, some 
> employee says, "That may be a bug," or "That looks like a bug." 
> There's never anything official about it, AFAIK. Is there an official 
> bug list that mortals can reach? I never heard of any.
>
Well, if you look at the past postings to this list by Daniel Lichtblau 
  you will find that he not infrequently writes "this is a bug"  and 
sometimes even "this is my bug". I consider such statements as 
authoritative and official even when they contain a disclaimer ;-)

Andrzej