Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2004
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Nasty bug in Integrate (version 5.0)

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg46009] Re: Nasty bug in Integrate (version 5.0)
  • From: drbob at bigfoot.com (Bobby R. Treat)
  • Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 05:21:07 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <200401281019.FAA18530@smc.vnet.net> <bvapk6$aat$1@smc.vnet.net> <bvhq1p$8e5$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

>>Has anyone in MathGroup found any other undocumented options?

I'd estimate there are, roughly, a million undocumented options.

Bobby

Harold.Noffke at wpafb.af.mil (Harold Noffke) wrote in message news:<bvhq1p$8e5$1 at smc.vnet.net>...
> Andrzej:
> 
> I am impressed with your pointer to TraceInternal, but can find no
> reference to it in Mathematica 5.0 online docs.
> 
> > If you really want to see how much checking Mathematica attempts to do 
> > just evaluate:
> > 
> > Trace[Integrate[1/x + x^c, {x, a, b}], TraceInternal->True]
> > 
> > and be prepared to wait and obtain a huge output.
> 
> I checked comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica and found that TraceInternal
> is undocumented.  This suggests other undocumented Mathematica options
> might be discovered by using Options[Built-In-Function-Name].  You
> would have to sift through all the Built-Ins to identify all the
> undocumented options.
> 
> Has anyone in MathGroup found any other undocumented options?
> 
> Thanks.
> Harold


  • Prev by Date: Mathematica 5.0.1 & MathLink for Excel 2.1.1
  • Next by Date: Re: How to make the Mathematica Kernel return DisplayPackets?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Nasty bug in Integrate (version 5.0)
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Nasty bug in Integrate (version 5.0)