MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Understanding Flatten

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg46317] Re: Understanding Flatten
  • From: Bill Rowe <readnewsciv at>
  • Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 04:37:53 -0500 (EST)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

On 2/13/04 at 9:58 PM, Harold.Noffke at (Harold Noffke)

>In my study of Flatten, the Mathematica Book gives this example ...

>You can use Flatten to "splice" sequences of elements into lists or
>other expressions.

>In[5]:= Flatten[ {a, f[b, c], f[a, b, d]}, 1, f ]

>Out[5]= {a,b,c,a,b,d}

>I modified In[5] as follows ...

>In[1]:= Flatten[ { {a, f[b, c], f[a, b, d]}, {g, f[e, g]} }]

>Out[1]= {a, f[b, c], f[a, b, d], g, f[e, g]}

>I don't see why adding {g, f[e, g]} as a second list to the In[5]
>example unflattens Flatten's answer.  What am I misunderstanding?

You did more than just add {g, f[e, g]} to the end of the list to be flattened. You deleted the 2nd and 3rd arguments which told Flatten things with head f.
To reply via email subtract one hundred and four

  • Prev by Date: Re: Need definitions for lhs=rhs
  • Next by Date: Re: C Code
  • Previous by thread: Re: Understanding Flatten
  • Next by thread: Re: Understanding Flatten