MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Understanding Flatten

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg46319] Re: Understanding Flatten
  • From: drbob at (Bobby R. Treat)
  • Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 04:37:54 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <c0k52g$8pd$>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

>>I don't see why adding {g, f[e, g]} as a second list to...

That's not the only difference between the two Flatten statements.


Harold.Noffke at (Harold Noffke) wrote in message news:<c0k52g$8pd$1 at>...
> Mathematica 5.0.1 on Windows 2000
> MathGroup:
> In my study of Flatten, the Mathematica Book gives this example ...
> 	You can use Flatten to "splice" sequences of elements into lists
> 	or other expressions.  
> 	In[5]:= Flatten[ {a, f[b, c], f[a, b, d]}, 1, f ]
> 	Out[5]= {a,b,c,a,b,d}
> I modified In[5] as follows ...
> 	In[1]:= Flatten[ { {a, f[b, c], f[a, b, d]}, {g, f[e, g]} }]
> 	Out[1]= {a, f[b, c], f[a, b, d], g, f[e, g]}	
> I don't see why adding {g, f[e, g]} as a second list to the In[5] example
> unflattens Flatten's answer.  What am I misunderstanding?
> Thanks.
> Harold

  • Prev by Date: Re: C Code
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: how to explain this weird effect? Integrate
  • Previous by thread: Re: Understanding Flatten
  • Next by thread: RE: Understanding Flatten