Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2004
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Who find a better fit of this experimental data?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg45631] Re: Who find a better fit of this experimental data?
  • From: poujadej at yahoo.fr (Jean-Claude Poujade)
  • Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:57:10 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <bu8ihs$ars$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

guillerm at aida.usal.es (Guillermo Sanchez) wrote in message news:<bu8ihs$ars$1 at smc.vnet.net>...
> Dear group?. 
> I attach some expemental data. I have fitted them with a biexponential
> function, but the fit is not good enough. Who find a better fit of
> this experimental data?
[...]

With :

f1[t_] := a t Exp[-b t];
NonlinearRegress[data, f1[t], {t}, {{a,10000},{b,10}}]

the estimated variance seems to be better...
---
jcp


  • Prev by Date: Re: Run in Windows
  • Next by Date: Fwd: Simple list operation
  • Previous by thread: Who find a better fit of this experimental data?
  • Next by thread: Re: Who find a better fit of this experimental data?