|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Anyone using the Units package extensively?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg45682] Re: Anyone using the Units package extensively?
- From: AES/newspost <siegman at stanford.edu>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 05:15:26 -0500 (EST)
- References: <buaov3$mih$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
In article <buaov3$mih$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
Bill Rowe <readnewsciv at earthlink.net> wrote:
> On 1/16/04 at 7:58 PM, siegman at stanford.edu (AES/newspost) wrote:
>
> > Can't say I do this extensively, but I routinely define
>
> > deg = Pi/180.
>
> FWIW, this isn't needed since Degree is already defined as Pi/180
> --
> To reply via email subtract one hundred and four
True enough, but in many cases I actually wantjust a simple real value
"Pi/180." (note period), not "Pi/180" -- for instance so that various
text labels in Plots and values in Tables get displayed as simple real
number rather than as awkwardly formatted fractions.
More generally, I believe Degree has some other sophisticated or
non-obvious consequences built in, and I'd prefer not to get caught by
any of those.
Prev by Date:
RE: Re: Anyone using the Units package extensively?
Next by Date:
RE: Padding arrays with reversed elements
Previous by thread:
RE: Re: Anyone using the Units package extensively?
Next by thread:
Re: Anyone using the Units package extensively?
|