|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Re: Anyone using the Units package extensively?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg45675] RE: [mg45666] Re: Anyone using the Units package extensively?
- From: "David Park" <djmp at earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 05:15:18 -0500 (EST)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Bill,
Yes, but the problem is that if one is using the Units package then Degree
is both a Unit and a Mathematica Constant. The usages conflict and I believe
it was a mistake in design.
If a approximate number is converted the the unit Degree, than operating as
a constant the result is immediately converted back to radians.
Perhaps Degrees should have been used for the constant and Degree for the
unit.
David Park
djmp at earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~djmp/
From: Bill Rowe [mailto:readnewsciv at earthlink.net]
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
On 1/16/04 at 7:58 PM, siegman at stanford.edu (AES/newspost) wrote:
> Can't say I do this extensively, but I routinely define
> deg = Pi/180.
FWIW, this isn't needed since Degree is already defined as Pi/180
--
To reply via email subtract one hundred and four
Prev by Date:
Re: StruveH runtime error
Next by Date:
Re: Anyone using the Units package extensively?
Previous by thread:
Re: Anyone using the Units package extensively?
Next by thread:
Re: Anyone using the Units package extensively?
|