Re: typesetting fractions
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg45946] Re: typesetting fractions
- From: carlos at colorado.edu (Carlos Felippa)
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 04:16:29 -0500 (EST)
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Paul Abbott <paul at physics.uwa.edu.au> wrote in message news:<bvaq5e$ag2$1 at smc.vnet.net>...
> In article <buqmch$raa$1 at smc.vnet.net>, Garry Helzer <gah at math.umd.edu>
> > Here's my question. TeX does an excellent job in this regard. TeX has been
> > around since the '60s and is open source.
For the record: TeX, as used now, was released in 1980 (the raw
Pascal version, not WEB). I know since I had to write some of the
earlier dvi-to-printer drivers on a Vax 780.
Before TeX there was troff, but that was in the mid-1970s, and
that tool ran only under Unix.
Prev by Date:
Deviation in plots of same function
Next by Date:
Identical functions not identical ?!
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: typesetting fractions
Next by thread:
Re: how to 'edit' MatrixForm output to create a new matrix?