|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Notation and Symbolize Packages
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg45972] Notation and Symbolize Packages
- From: "Prince-Wright, Robert G SEPCO" <robert.prince-wright at shell.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 05:20:36 -0500 (EST)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Does someone know if Mathematica 5 uses the same version of the Notation package
as that posted at Wolfram.com. The web page below lists several files
that are not continaned in the ZIP file.
http://library.wolfram.com/packages/notation/
The reason I looked at this site was to try and understand how to use
Symbolize in the Notation package. This seems to be one of the most
frustrating aspects of Mathematica, especially for engineers who routinely use
subscripts, accents etc in their traditional notations. It seems like
one mistake, like not using the palette because you copy and past can
get you into unfathomable trouble - especially when using Modules. On
that point - am I correct in thinking that you cant mix normal and
Symbolized arguments to functions you are defining or have I made
another unfathomable mistake?
Finally, if the folks at Wolfram are watching is there a reason by we
can have an option to Symbolize all variables in a Notebook - I would
doubt there are many engineers out there using subscripts as variables.
Robert Prince-Wright
HSE Engineer
Shell Exploration & Production Company
One Shell Square, P. O. Box 61933, New Orleans, LA 70161-1933, United
States of America
Tel: +1 504 728 7720 7720
Email: robert.prince-wright at shell.com
Internet: http://www.shell.com
Prev by Date:
Mathematica fonts in LaTeX
Next by Date:
clarification. Re: one liner for a function?
Previous by thread:
Mathematica fonts in LaTeX
Next by thread:
clarification. Re: one liner for a function?
|