[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: one liner for a function?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg45964] Re: one liner for a function?
*From*: bobhanlon at aol.com (Bob Hanlon)
*Date*: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 05:20:27 -0500 (EST)
*References*: <bvd9f8$5k1$1@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Needs["Graphics`"];
sol=NDSolve[{a'[t]==-0.1` a[t] x[t],
b'[t]==-0.05` b[t] y[t],
x'[t]==-0.1` a[t] x[t]+0.05` b[t] y[t],
y'[t]==0.1` a[t] x[t]-0.05` b[t] y[t],
a[0]==1,b[0]==1,x[0]==1,y[0]==0},
{a,b,x,y},{t,0,250}][[1]];
Plot[Evaluate[#[[2]][t]& /@ sol],{t,0,250},
PlotStyle->Table[Hue[(k+2)/6],{k,4}],
Frame->True, Axes->False,
PlotLegend->(#[[1]]& /@ sol),
LegendPosition->{.95,-.35},ImageSize->400];
n=1;DisplayTogetherArray[
Partition[Plot[Evaluate[#[[2]][t]],{t,0,250},
PlotStyle->Hue[(2+n++)/6],
PlotLabel->#[[1]],
Frame->True, Axes->False]& /@ sol,2],
ImageSize->400];
Bob Hanlon
In article <bvd9f8$5k1$1 at smc.vnet.net>, sean_incali at yahoo.com (sean kim) wrote:
<< 1. let's say you have to make GraphicsArray using the interpolating
functions.
I have managed to write a function that automates the plotting part,
but i haven't been able to write one that will automate plotting and
naming the plot object and showing in a graphics array.
as an example,
sol= NDSolve[{a'[t]==-0.1` a[t] x[t], b'[t]==-0.05` b[t] y[t],
x'[t]==-0.1` a[t] x[t]+0.05` b[t] y[t],
y'[t]==0.1` a[t] x[t]-0.05` b[t] y[t], a[0]==1, b[0]==1,
x[0]==1,
y[0]==0}, {a,b,x,y},{t,0,250}][[1]];
pfunc[name_]:= Plot[Evaluate[{name[t]/. sol}, {t, 0, 250}],
PlotRange-> All, DisplayFunction -> Identity, PlotLabel -> name];
pa = pfunc[a];
pb = pfunc[b];
px = pfunc[x];
py = pfunc[y];
Show[GraphicsArray [{{pa, pb}, {px, py}}], ImageSize-> 500]
funtion I wrote called "pfunc" does fine, but i was wondering is there
a way to automate the
pa = pfunc[a]; ... py = pfunc[y];
and
Show[GraphicsArray [{{pa, pb}, {px, py}}], ImageSize-> 500]
part also?
I can't seem to figure out a way to take the output of function to
make another function.. and that seems to me what i have to do.. ( i
don't even know that make sense to you guys...)
2. once you have everythign in function form, can you write it in one
liner format? ( perhaps with some explanations? )
Prev by Date:
**clarification. Re: one liner for a function?**
Next by Date:
**Re: Simplifying a second order eq. system**
Previous by thread:
**one liner for a function?**
Next by thread:
**Re: one liner for a function?**
| |