       Re: one liner for a function?

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg45964] Re: one liner for a function?
• From: bobhanlon at aol.com (Bob Hanlon)
• Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 05:20:27 -0500 (EST)
• References: <bvd9f8\$5k1\$1@smc.vnet.net>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

```Needs["Graphics`"];

sol=NDSolve[{a'[t]==-0.1` a[t] x[t],
b'[t]==-0.05` b[t] y[t],
x'[t]==-0.1` a[t] x[t]+0.05` b[t] y[t],
y'[t]==0.1` a[t] x[t]-0.05` b[t] y[t],
a==1,b==1,x==1,y==0},
{a,b,x,y},{t,0,250}][];

Plot[Evaluate[#[][t]& /@ sol],{t,0,250},
PlotStyle->Table[Hue[(k+2)/6],{k,4}],
Frame->True, Axes->False,
PlotLegend->(#[]& /@ sol),
LegendPosition->{.95,-.35},ImageSize->400];

n=1;DisplayTogetherArray[
Partition[Plot[Evaluate[#[][t]],{t,0,250},
PlotStyle->Hue[(2+n++)/6],
PlotLabel->#[],
Frame->True, Axes->False]& /@ sol,2],
ImageSize->400];

Bob Hanlon

In article <bvd9f8\$5k1\$1 at smc.vnet.net>, sean_incali at yahoo.com (sean kim) wrote:

<< 1. let's say you have to make GraphicsArray using the interpolating
functions.
I have managed to write a function that automates the plotting part,
but i haven't been able to write one that will automate plotting and
naming the plot object and showing in a graphics array.

as an example,

sol= NDSolve[{a'[t]==-0.1` a[t] x[t], b'[t]==-0.05` b[t] y[t],
x'[t]==-0.1` a[t] x[t]+0.05` b[t] y[t],
y'[t]==0.1` a[t] x[t]-0.05` b[t] y[t], a==1, b==1,
x==1,
y==0}, {a,b,x,y},{t,0,250}][];

pfunc[name_]:= Plot[Evaluate[{name[t]/. sol}, {t, 0, 250}],
PlotRange-> All, DisplayFunction -> Identity, PlotLabel -> name];

pa = pfunc[a];
pb = pfunc[b];
px = pfunc[x];
py = pfunc[y];

Show[GraphicsArray [{{pa, pb}, {px, py}}], ImageSize-> 500]

funtion I wrote called "pfunc" does fine, but i was wondering is there
a way to automate the

pa = pfunc[a]; ... py = pfunc[y];

and

Show[GraphicsArray [{{pa, pb}, {px, py}}], ImageSize-> 500]

part also?

I can't seem to figure out a way to take the output of function to
make another function.. and that seems to me what i have to do.. ( i
don't even know that make sense to you guys...)

2. once you have everythign in function form, can you write it in one
liner format? ( perhaps with some explanations? )

```

• Prev by Date: clarification. Re: one liner for a function?
• Next by Date: Re: Simplifying a second order eq. system
• Previous by thread: one liner for a function?
• Next by thread: Re: one liner for a function?