[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: one liner for a function?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg45978] Re: one liner for a function?
*From*: drbob at bigfoot.com (Bobby R. Treat)
*Date*: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 05:20:45 -0500 (EST)
*References*: <bvd9f8$5k1$1@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
How's this?
sol = First@
NDSolve[{a'[
t] == -0.1` a[t]
x[t], b'[t] == -0.05` b[t] y[t], x'[t] == -0.1` a[t]
x[t] + 0.05` b[t] y[t], y'[t] == 0.1` a[t] x[t] - 0.05` b[t]
y[t],
a[0] == 1, b[0] == 1, x[0] == 1, y[0] ==
0}, {a, b, x, y}, {t, 0, 250}];
Show[GraphicsArray[
Map[Plot[#[t] /. sol, {t, 0, 250},
DisplayFunction -> Identity, PlotRange -> All,
PlotLabel -> #] &, {{a, b}, {x, y}}, {-1}]], ImageSize ->
500]
The level specification for Map could be {2} rather than {-1} just as
well. {2} means all elements at level two, while {-1} means all leaf
nodes and, for the matrix {{a,b},{x,y}}, the two are the same thing.
In either case, a pure function (Plot[...]&) is mapped onto those
elements of the matrix producing a matrix of Graphics objects, and
that's the input GraphicsArray needs.
Here's another solution for which the level specification can't be
{-1}. Notice the labels are different.
sol = First@
NDSolve[{a'[
t] == -0.1` a[t]
x[t], b'[t] == -0.05` b[t] y[t], x'[t] == -0.1` a[t]
x[t] + 0.05` b[t] y[t], y'[t] == 0.1` a[t] x[t] - 0.05` b[t]
y[t],
a[0] == 1, b[0] == 1, x[0] == 1, y[0] ==
0}, {a[t], b[t], x[t], y[t]}, {t, 0, 250}];
Show[GraphicsArray[Map[Plot[# /. sol, {t,
0, 250}, DisplayFunction -> Identity, PlotRange -> All,
PlotLabel -> #] &, {{a[t], b[t]}, {x[t], y[
t]}}, {2}]], ImageSize -> 500]
And this combines sol from the second solution with Show from the
first:
sol = First@
NDSolve[{a'[
t] == -0.1` a[t]
x[t], b'[t] == -0.05` b[t] y[t], x'[t] == -0.1` a[t]
x[t] + 0.05` b[t] y[t], y'[t] == 0.1` a[t] x[t] - 0.05` b[t]
y[t],
a[0] == 1, b[0] == 1, x[0] == 1, y[0] ==
0}, {a[t], b[t], x[t], y[t]}, {t, 0, 250}];
Show[GraphicsArray[Map[Plot[#[t] /. sol, {t, 0, 250}, DisplayFunction
->
Identity, PlotRange -> All, PlotLabel -> #] &, {{a, b}, {x,
y}}, {
2}]], ImageSize -> 500]
Bobby
sean_incali at yahoo.com (sean kim) wrote in message news:<bvd9f8$5k1$1 at smc.vnet.net>...
> I have been asking questions for three straight night in a row...
>
> I appreciate all the replies.
>
> I have another couple of questions tonight.
>
> 1. let's say you have to make GraphicsArray using the interpolating
> functions.
> I have managed to write a function that automates the plotting part,
> but i haven't been able to write one that will automate plotting and
> naming the plot object and showing in a graphics array.
>
> as an example,
>
> sol= NDSolve[{a'[t]==-0.1` a[t] x[t], b'[t]==-0.05` b[t] y[t],
> x'[t]==-0.1` a[t] x[t]+0.05` b[t] y[t],
> y'[t]==0.1` a[t] x[t]-0.05` b[t] y[t], a[0]==1, b[0]==1,
> x[0]==1,
> y[0]==0}, {a,b,x,y},{t,0,250}][[1]];
>
> pfunc[name_]:= Plot[Evaluate[{name[t]/. sol}, {t, 0, 250}],
> PlotRange-> All, DisplayFunction -> Identity, PlotLabel -> name];
>
> pa = pfunc[a];
> pb = pfunc[b];
> px = pfunc[x];
> py = pfunc[y];
>
> Show[GraphicsArray [{{pa, pb}, {px, py}}], ImageSize-> 500]
>
>
> funtion I wrote called "pfunc" does fine, but i was wondering is there
> a way to automate the
>
> pa = pfunc[a]; ... py = pfunc[y];
>
> and
>
> Show[GraphicsArray [{{pa, pb}, {px, py}}], ImageSize-> 500]
>
> part also?
>
> I can't seem to figure out a way to take the output of function to
> make another function.. and that seems to me what i have to do.. ( i
> don't even know that make sense to you guys...)
>
>
> 2. once you have everythign in function form, can you write it in one
> liner format? ( perhaps with some explanations? )
>
> as always any and all thoughts and replies are thoroughly appreciated.
>
> thanks all in advance.
>
> sean
Prev by Date:
**Re: Re: Nasty bug in Integrate (version 5.0)**
Next by Date:
**Re: AW: Re: Nasty bug in Integrate (version 5.0)**
Previous by thread:
**Re: one liner for a function?**
Next by thread:
**Defining a function in module problem?**
| |