MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: kuen surface

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg48055] Re: kuen surface
  • From: mathma18 at (Narasimham G.L.)
  • Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 03:02:29 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <c77982$hj3$> <c77tga$2pe$>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at> wrote in message news:<c77tga$2pe$1 at>...
> Hi,
> Regards   Jens

> > bernazzani at wrote:
> > kindly I would want to know as the same graphics(kuen surface) is
> > constructed with Mathematica.

Some portions of Kuen surface in above Wolfram site do not show well.
Portions that ought to be negatively curved look conical, may be
improper limits of u,v parameters and/or too few PlotPoints chosen. In this
area is better depicted.
It appears even the 'classical' limits do not show the Kuen details
well enough .See detail due to extended u parameter curling it up
inside my plot:

ParametricPlot3D[{x,y,z},{u,-3 Pi, Pi},{v,.2,2.9 },

  • Prev by Date: Finding errors in my code?
  • Next by Date: Re: how to save a mathematica-made imagebox.image as jpg, gif, bmp in c#/.netlink?
  • Previous by thread: Re: kuen surface
  • Next by thread: RE: Re: kuen surface