|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: On constants and D's behaviour
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg52462] Re: [mg52428] On constants and D's behaviour
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
- Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:06:44 -0500 (EST)
- References: <200411270640.BAA17097@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
On 27 Nov 2004, at 07:40, Nicolas Girard wrote:
> Dear people,
> just a thought, from a frustrated mind:
>
> given that one can explicitely tell a symbol is a constant by modifying
> its attributes, then why the hell doesn't the partial derivative D take
> advantage of it, and treat nonconstant symbol as.... nonconstants, by
> default ??
>
> Cheers,
> Nicolas
>
>
>
>
Why should D duplicate another functions behaviour? Use Dt instead of D:
Dt[c, x]
Dt[c, x]
SetAttributes[c, Constant]
Dt[c, x]
0
Andrzej Kozlowski
Chiba, Japan
http://www.akikoz.net/~andrzej/
http://www.mimuw.edu.pl/~akoz/
Prev by Date:
Re: On constants and D's behaviour
Next by Date:
Re: How to prevent from simplification?
Previous by thread:
On constants and D's behaviour
Next by thread:
Re: On constants and D's behaviour
|