MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: my wish list for Mathematica next major version

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg59948] Re: [mg59901] my wish list for Mathematica next major version
  • From: János <janos.lobb at yale.edu>
  • Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 04:53:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200508251033.GAA10067@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

On Aug 25, 2005, at 6:33 AM, Nasser Abbasi wrote:

>
> Hello;
>
> I thought I'll share some of the things I wish Mathematica could have,
> may be someone from Wolfram company will listen.
>
> 1. A real, good, easy to use, GUI based debugger. With break points,
> line numbers, full source code tracing, stack frame display (call
> history), step/in/out, etc.. This is for me the most important item to
> have. Debugging Mathematica code can be a pain due to lack of a good
> debugger.
>
> 2. Ability to build graphics user interfaces, to allow one to make it
> easier to interface to their Mathematica applications. This should
> have a wizard type graphic interface builder to make it easy and fast
> to build UI's. With callbacks.
>
> 3. To be able to compile Mathematica applications to a standalone
> executables, that can run on any PC without having to install
> Mathematica on that PC to run the app.  (nice to have, but not
> critical).
>
> 4. A package manager. GUI based. Easy to use. To allow one to easily
> add and remove packages, manage packages, etc...
>
> 5. Improve the graphics to allow one to much easily manipulate the
> plots with the mouse, rotate, zoom, modify the plot attributes etc...
> Currently plots are static, even though Mathematica plots are the best
> I've seen. RealTime3D just does not do it.
>
> 6. Better information to the public about version numbers, release
> dates and products time-lines for all the Mathematica products. I have
> few Mathematica applications, which I have to struggle to find what
> version numbers they are, when will there be an update made available,
> many have not had any update for 2-3 years, not even a minor update. I
> have no idea how something like this is possible. Last time I asked on
> this, which was a year ago, I was told the specific app in question
> was in active development internally, yet, one year later, no more
> news and no updates.
>
> If some of these apps are no longer active,

7.  Non-active apps on active OSs should be free.  Like Sybase does  
with its 11.9 line of ASE on Linux.  That would give Wolfram a much  
wider base.  No apps should be sold which are on a discontinued OS  
like NKS Explorer on Mac OS 9.  /Mac OS 9 and Classic are NOT the  
same OS :)/

János

> please tell us and make it
> clear. There should be a web page listing all the products, with
> version numbers, release dats, anticipated next version release date,
> etc.. Please communicate more and better with your customers.
>
> If I think of anything more, I'll post them.
>
> Thank you for listening. Any hope of getting any of the above soon? :)
>
> Nasser
>
>

----------------------------------------------
Trying to argue with a politician is like lifting up the head of a  
corpse.
(S. Lem: His Master Voice)


  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: with 5.2 Mac
  • Next by Date: Re: my wish list for Mathematica next major version
  • Previous by thread: my wish list for Mathematica next major version
  • Next by thread: Re: my wish list for Mathematica next major version