Re: Re: Types in Mathematica thread
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg62851] Re: Re: Types in Mathematica thread
- From: albert <awnl at arcor.de>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:10:22 -0500 (EST)
- References: <200512060543.AAA03708@smc.vnet.net> <dn3fos$7l2$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Hi, > The discussion was not about testing whether something is a real > number or not (in the mathematical sense). This you test with Element > [something, Reals]. The discussion was about "types". Please note the > title of the thread to which you have just contributed, or even > better rerad the thread. Well, the "type" of objects with head Real > in Mathematica is exactly what InexactNumberQ tests for. A > mathematica _Real is not a "real number" in the sense of mathematics > but precisely an "inexact number". Basically I agree with your answer, but what about: In[10]:= InexactNumberQ[0.5 I] Out[10]= True albert
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Re: Types in Mathematica thread
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl>
- Re: Re: Re: Types in Mathematica thread
- References:
- Re: Types in Mathematica thread
- From: Bill Rowe <readnewsciv@earthlink.net>
- Re: Types in Mathematica thread