Re: Fourier function...having problems reproducing answers in a paper

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg54059] Re: Fourier function...having problems reproducing answers in a paper
• From: Paul Abbott <paul at physics.uwa.edu.au>
• Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:27:34 -0500 (EST)
• Organization: The University of Western Australia
• References: <cua5b2\$hh8\$1@smc.vnet.net>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

In article <cua5b2\$hh8\$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
"elparedblanco" <cire1611 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> I am using the Fourier function on a simple list probability
> distribution {.5,0,.4,0,0,.1}.  The paper I'm reading says I should be
> geting an answer like this:
>
> {1, .35-.2598i, .25+.433i, .8, .25-.433i, .35+.2598i}.
>
> However this is what Mathematica is returning:
>
> {.408248 + i,  .142887 + .106066i, .102062 - .176777i .326599 + i,
> .102062 + .17677i, .142887 - .106066i }
>
> I assume that these are somehow equivilant.  Can some explain how/why?

If you compute

ift = InverseFourier[{0.5, 0, 0.4, 0, 0, 0.1}]

and then normalize,

Chop[ift Sqrt[Length[ift]]]

you get the same answer (up to numerical round-off) as the paper you're

For an explanation, see page 218 of

Crandall, R. 1991, Mathematica for the Sciences,

Cheers,
Paul

--
Paul Abbott                                   Phone: +61 8 6488 2734
School of Physics, M013                         Fax: +61 8 6488 1014
The University of Western Australia      (CRICOS Provider No 00126G)
35 Stirling Highway
Crawley WA 6009                      mailto:paul at physics.uwa.edu.au
AUSTRALIA                            http://physics.uwa.edu.au/~paul

• Prev by Date: Re: problem with FindRoot
• Next by Date: Re: bugs in Mathematica 5.1
• Previous by thread: Re: Fourier function...having problems reproducing answers in a paper
• Next by thread: Extended Expand and ExpandAll.