MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Missing Graphics

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg54289] Re: [mg54248] Missing Graphics
  • From: DrBob <drbob at bigfoot.com>
  • Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:36:09 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <200502150250.VAA27274@smc.vnet.net>
  • Reply-to: drbob at bigfoot.com
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Because that option isn't "passed" from Plot3D to SurfaceGraphics, but it IS passed to the other three. There's a lot of inconsistency in the graphics modules, and lots of options are not passed when you might expect them to be.

DrawGraphics (by David Park) fixes and avoids such problems very nicely.

Bobby

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:50:41 -0500 (EST), Bruce Colletti <vze269bv at verizon.net> wrote:

> Re Mathematica 5.1.
>
> This code displays (as intended) five versions of g (first two are same):
>
> g = Plot3D[Sin@x Cos@y, {x, -PI, PI}, {y, -PI, PI}];
>
> Scan[Show@#@g &, {SurfaceGraphics, Graphics, ContourGraphics,
>     DensityGraphics}];
>
> However, when DisplayFunction->Identity is added to Plot3D, only the SurfaceGraphics plot appears.  Why don't the others?
>
> Thankx.
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
>



-- 
DrBob at bigfoot.com
www.eclecticdreams.net


  • Prev by Date: comparing two lists
  • Next by Date: Re: "teach" mathematica an integral
  • Previous by thread: Re: Missing Graphics
  • Next by thread: Re: Missing Graphics