[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: Re: Bug Report - Two numerical values for a same variable
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg54353] Re: [mg54322] Re: Re: Bug Report - Two numerical values for a same variable
*From*: Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu>
*Date*: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 02:31:54 -0500 (EST)
*Organization*: Mathematics & Statistics, Univ. of Mass./Amherst
*References*: <00ed01c512b0$2f242850$6400a8c0@Main> <curpbn$r28$1@smc.vnet.net> <200502150438.XAA29728@smc.vnet.net> <cv0953$jbg$1@smc.vnet.net> <200502171530.KAA02364@smc.vnet.net>
*Reply-to*: murray at math.umass.edu
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Right. And one can use something like
StringTake["HelloWorld", {6}]
to extract part of the "atom" that is the string there. (This is in
contrast, say, to taking Floor[3.14] which is clearly applying an
"operation" to the atome 3.14.)
So that's why I originally said I wasn't too sure why strings were
atoms, either.
Steve Luttrell wrote:
> I am also uneasy about Complex and Rational being atomic. The only reason I
> can think of is that computational efficiency might prefer these to be
> atomic objects.
>
> You can do the following to extract the parts of a Rational:
>
> Numerator[Rational[1, 2]]
>
> Denominator[Rational[1, 2]]
>
> Analogously, Re and Im can be used to extract the "parts" of a Complex.
>
> Steve Luttrell
>
> "Murray Eisenberg" <murray at math.umass.edu> wrote in message
> news:cv0953$jbg$1 at smc.vnet.net...
>
>>The manipulations below are precisely what's so confusing about Rational
>>objects (and Complex objects) being atoms. If
>>
>> 1/2 /. Rational[x_, 2] -> Rational[x, 7]
>>
>>works, then why not the following?
>>
>> Part[Rational[1, 2], 2]
>>
>>I can "believe" that integers and reals (and maybe strings) are atoms;
>>but believing that rationals and complex numbers are atoms is a hard
>>thing to swallow!
>>
>>This has always bothered me -- and hence given me trouble trying to, um,
>>rationalize this to students when I've taught Mathematica.
>>
>>
>>Scott Hemphill wrote:
>>
>>>DrBob <drbob at bigfoot.com> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>That explains it, but only in the sense that "things fall down" is a
>>>>theory of gravity. Why should Rationals be atomic, for goodness sake? And
>>>>how did I use Mathematica all this time without hearing about it?
>>>>
>>>>Sigh...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>In[1]:= FullForm[1/2]
>>>
>>>Out[1]//FullForm= Rational[1, 2]
>>>
>>>In[2]:= 1/2 /. Rational[x_,2] -> Rational[x,7]
>>>
>>> 1
>>>Out[2]= -
>>> 7
>>>
>>>Scott
>>
>>--
>>Murray Eisenberg murray at math.umass.edu
>>Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
>>Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H)
>>University of Massachusetts 413 545-2859 (W)
>>710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801
>>Amherst, MA 01003-9305
>>
>
>
>
>
--
Murray Eisenberg murray at math.umass.edu
Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H)
University of Massachusetts 413 545-2859 (W)
710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801
Amherst, MA 01003-9305
Prev by Date:
**Re: Quite Upset with NIntegrate**
Next by Date:
**Re: Re: Re: Bug Report - Two numerical values for a same variable**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Re: Bug Report - Two numerical values for a same variable**
Next by thread:
**Re: Re: Re: Re: Bug Report - Two numerical values for a same variable**
| |