[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Why does Inverse[M] hesitate?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg54452] Re: [mg54370] Why does Inverse[M] hesitate?
*From*: DrBob <drbob at bigfoot.com>
*Date*: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 00:11:05 -0500 (EST)
*References*: <200502190732.CAA06115@smc.vnet.net>
*Reply-to*: drbob at bigfoot.com
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
I see no such "hesitation". For example:
A = Array[a, {2, 2}];
B = Array[b, {2, 2}];
Inverse[A].B
{{(a[2, 2]*b[1, 1])/
((-a[1, 2])*a[2, 1] +
a[1, 1]*a[2, 2]) -
(a[1, 2]*b[2, 1])/
((-a[1, 2])*a[2, 1] +
a[1, 1]*a[2, 2]),
(a[2, 2]*b[1, 2])/
((-a[1, 2])*a[2, 1] +
a[1, 1]*a[2, 2]) -
(a[1, 2]*b[2, 2])/
((-a[1, 2])*a[2, 1] +
a[1, 1]*a[2, 2])},
{-((a[2, 1]*b[1, 1])/
((-a[1, 2])*a[2, 1] +
a[1, 1]*a[2, 2])) +
(a[1, 1]*b[2, 1])/
((-a[1, 2])*a[2, 1] +
a[1, 1]*a[2, 2]),
-((a[2, 1]*b[1, 2])/
((-a[1, 2])*a[2, 1] +
a[1, 1]*a[2, 2])) +
(a[1, 1]*b[2, 2])/
((-a[1, 2])*a[2, 1] +
a[1, 1]*a[2, 2])}}
Bobby
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 02:32:29 -0500 (EST), Skirmantas <skirmantas.janusonis at yale.edu> wrote:
> I'm puzzled by the following in Mathematica 5.0 and 5.1:
> If I define a symbolic matrix A and a symbolic matrix B and ask to
> calculate Inverse[A].B, the output is the same input operation with
> the A and B expanded. I have re-input this output, I finally get the
> result.
>
>
>
>
--
DrBob at bigfoot.com
www.eclecticdreams.net
Prev by Date:
**Re: Elegant syntax for multiple conditional assignment?**
Next by Date:
**Re: Question about an integral**
Previous by thread:
**Why does Inverse[M] hesitate?**
Next by thread:
**Re: Why does Inverse[M] hesitate?**
| |